|
1
|
- Frank P. Wong
- Department of Plant Pathology
- University of California, Riverside
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Fungal diseases are the number one cause of plant loss caused by
microorganisms
- Fungicides are a valuable part of IPM programs
- Tolerance for disease is low
- No effective cultural controls
- Most energy efficient way to control fungi
- Use fungicides properly and maintain their long-term utility
|
|
6
|
- Occurs when fungi adapt to fungicides which leads to
- immunity
- reduced efficacy
- Inheritable trait, passed on from one generation to the next
- Impact
- Direct crop loss
- Wasted time and money
- Loss of disease control options
|
|
7
|
- Both are high risk situations
- Monoculture
- Constant cropping/perennial crop system
- High value/low disease tolerance
- Often limited in cultural control options/choices for resistant
varieties
|
|
8
|
- Not of major concern until the introduction of site-specific fungicides
(1970s)
- Multi-site (captan, chlorothalanil, EBDCs, sulfur)
- Single-site (benzimidazoles, DMIs, QoIs)
- Site-specific fungicide benefits:
- Systemic/ curative properties
- Reduced non-target effects/environmental impact
- Resistance development to these is much easier
- Small genetic changes in fungi overcome fungicides targeted at one
enzyme or biochemical pathway
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Nursery
- Botrytis grey mold
- dicarboximides, benzimidazoles
- Phytophthora root rots
- Turf
- Anthracnose
- benzimidazoles, QoIs, sterol biosynthesis inhib.
- Dollar spot
- dicarboximides, benzimidazoles
- Grey leaf spot
- Pythium blight
|
|
11
|
- Resistant individuals occur naturally at a very low frequency (<
0.0001%?)
- Natural mutants
- Sexual and asexual recombination
- Resistant individuals are selected by fungicide applications
- Repeated fungicide use increases the frequency of resistant individuals
- When this frequency is high enough, control is impacted – “practical
resistance”
- Fungicides do not “change” the fungus - only the population structure
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Many factors contribute to the risk of resistance for any given fungcide
|
|
14
|
- BMOA is the primary determinant of the fungicidal activity of a chemical
- Most fungicides function by binding to fungal cell components and
disrupting key metabolic functions
- Target specificity
- Multi-site Inhibitors
- Single-site Inhibitors
|
|
15
|
- Affect multiple metabolic processes
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Affect a specific metabolic process
- Bind to proteins via “lock and key” process
|
|
19
|
- Amino Acid and Protein Synthesis
- Sterol Biosynthesis
- Respiration
- (MET complex III)
- Respiration (unknown)
- Lipid Biosynthesis
- Sub. Aromatic Hydrocarbons
- Dicarboxymides
- mRNA Synthesis
- Nuclear Division
- Respiration (MET complex II)
|
|
20
|
- Cross-resistance affects all fungicides with a similar biochemical mode
of action
- Once resistance develops to a fungicide - all members of the same cross
resistance group are affected
- Examples:
- Benzimidazole resistance affects benlate, topsin-M
- QoI resistance affects Quadris, Abound, Flint, Headline, Cabrio
- DMI resistance affects Rally, Elite, Rubigan, Orbit
|
|
21
|
- Resistance occurs more frequently in pathogens that:
- Have a short generation time
- Have a high frequency of reproduction
- Are prone to genetic changes
- Each application is a selection event
- Higher chance of selection for resistance against large, fast
reproducing pathogens
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- Every application is a selection event
- Curative and eradicant applications are worse:
- Incomplete control
- Selection against a larger population
- Reduced rate applications are worse:
- Incomplete control
- Selection against a larger population
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- Resistance develops differently dependent on how many genes are involved
in resistance
- Polygenic (many genes)
- Quantitative or “shifting” resistance
- DMIs, SIs, dicarboximides
- Monogenic (one gene)
- Qualitative or “disruptive” resistance
- Benzimidazoles, phenylamides, QoIs
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
- Shifting
- Reduced control, especially at low label rates
- Reduced application intervals
- Slower to develop over time
- Disruptive
- No control at field rates
- Failures can be sudden and dramatic
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- Reduce the overall number of selection events
- Alternate fungicides with different modes of action
- Mixtures?
- site-specific + multi site = 1 selection event
- site-specific + site specific = 1 selection event each (selection for
double resistance)
- Worse when mixture partner is used at ½ rate
- Partner must provide 80% control to prevent resistance selection (Delp
1986)
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
- FRAC – intra-industry committee that determines use limits for new and
current chemistries
- Membership is primarily from large producers and focuses on larger
fungicide groups
- Primarily based in EU
- Enforces resistance management through label restrictions
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
- Older multi-site chemistries will have increased restrictions
- B2 carcinogens
- new efforts to examine SIs
- All new fungicides must have reduced non-target effects
- All new fungicides will be single-site
- New fungicides will take longer to develop and register
|
|
40
|
- Resistance is the Achilles’ heel of all site-specific fungicides
- Resistance occurs naturally
- Avoid the development of practical resistance
- Many mechanisms of resistance
- Know the chemical class of fungicides you use
- Know the cross-resistance classes
- Two resistance patterns:
- Disruptive resistance = “all or nothing”
- Shifting resistance = “partial loss”
|
|
41
|
- Reduce the total number of fungicide applications and resistance
selection events
- Alternate between cross-resistance groups
- Know the biochemical mode of action and cross resistance groups
- Reduce the population size being selected against
- Practice good disease management
- Don’t wait until the epidemic is raging
- Use fungicides effectively and efficiently
- Time applications based upon knowledge of disease epidemiology and
development
- Don’t cheat with rates or application intervals
- Don’t rely on curative/eradicant activity
- It may cost you more in the end
|
|
42
|
|